On Monday, 1 November 2004, I wrote a
review article for a local paper and on seeing it and reading it today, I NOTICE
that it was actually various young writers then affiliated to the now defunct
Budding Writers Association of Zimbabwe who were some of the first people writing
from within Zimbabwe to publish significant fictional work based on the fast
track land reform of Zimbabwe. Tinashe
Muchuri, Beavan Tapureta, Lawrence Hoba and Martin Denenga, you have your
own corner in Zimbabwean literature! Some of these writers are now more
established in writing and various other art forms. I also sense now that the
Budding Writers Association of Zimbabwe scored its firsts which it never lived
to benefit from. Below is that unedited review from 2004:
Zimbabwe land issue and
creativity
Zimbabwe’s Land Issue:The Budding
Writers’ Perspectives, Harare, 2004.ISBN:0-7974-2859-3
Editor: Dudziro Nhengu
A reflective Book Review by Memory Chirere
A new journal called ZIMBABWE LAND ISSUE has just hit the Zimbabwean and South African book markets like a bolt from the blue. It is the first in a new series of the “topical issues” journal being published by the Budding Writers of Zimbabwe (BWAZ).
BWAZ is a writer’s organization for
new and young authors of Zimbabwe formed in 1990. It has since grown to represent the nurturing
of the growing army of new voices in Zimbabwe.
With the return from exile in 1980 of
serious writers like Dambudzo Marechera, Stanley Nyamufukudza, Musaemura
Zimunya, Wilson Katiyo and others, there was a sudden and acute realization
amongst the youth that writing could be taken seriously and a man or woman
could be called “a writer.” With the
help of the then vibrant Zimbabwe Writers Union (ZIWU) there were inspiring
readings and literary talks in Harare, Gweru and Bulawayo.
In due course BWAZ was formed. To this day some of its earliest and founding
members like Albert Nyathi, Ignatius Mabasa and the late Stephen Alumenda have
grown to national stature.
Last month when the average
established writer of Zimbabwe was yet to contribute to the ongoing debate and
activities of the phenomenon now called the Zimbabwe Land Issue, BWAZ led the
way with a scintillating publication.
Since the start of the mass farm occupations over two years ago, there
has been remarkable silence about the land issue among Zimbabwe writers, save
for Alexander Kanengoni who has routinely dropped here a story and there an
essay-short story.
Could our writers be “playing it
safe” because they are afraid to define their different positions? Or, as one literary critic, Maurice Vambe
told me, “they are still watching, Memory.
If they were to write about the land issue as it happens, they risk
being journalists!” Really?
This BWAZ
journal contains short stories and a novella
based in various ways on the land issue in Zimbabwe. These pieces, it must be emphasized,
represent individual writers’ reaction
the land issue.
Handidzokere Shure Part 1-3 is a stimulating debate
in epistolary from. Three budding writers,
Tinashe Muchuri, the late Blessing Chihombori and Beaven Tapureta build up on
each other’s ideas and writings. Should
the land be taken away from the whites?
Should it be divided equally between black and white? What is the role
of women here? What is the role of history? Is the reform necessarily violent…?
In Part I there are two
letters – one from the “educated” George Gororo to his father and the other one
from the determined Mr Gororo himself, in response to his son’s letter. These
two letters represent two camps on the land issue. George is an industrial worker who
religiously believes that blacks cannot own farms because they neither have the
technical know-how nor the resources to meaningfully turn the land into food to
feed the whole nation. George believes
that blacks should only stick to domestic farming and leave commercial farming
to the whites, who according to him, “…are the champions of the Zimbabwe economy.”His father on the
other hand argues that the land belongs to the blacks, it is their birthright
and the white farmers must pack their belongings and leave for Britain.
Tinashe Muchuri continues with these
“letters” between father and son up to Part 4. Convinced that his father is an incorrigible
land occupier, George shifts and writes to his mother to “please plead with
father to leave Ndege’s farm now…” and stop dancing and ululating as the
menfolk subdivide the commercial farms.
And the mother responds with
unsurpassed verve: “You surprise me a lot George, my son. So you think I am just, ululating and
dancing? I am not silent, George. Ululating and dancing are a form of
communication too… strategic talking.”
While Muchuri’s letters dramatise the
typical irreconcilable perspectives to
the land issue in Zimbabwe, the writer could have gone beyond binarism.
The epistle form is understandably an attempt to recreate a community
dialoguing but the author could have taken this as opportunity to be more
nuanced. One could have given systematic
background to why father and son view the issue differently. Instead of erecting two war-fronts, one could
have added a third or even fourth dimension.
The land issue in Zimbabwe, ironically, has offered some people
opportunity for action or ambiguity or total detachment. More important, the
rearrangement of land in Zimbabwe has not only operated at a physical
level. The mass movement of people,
goods and properties has also caused a radical evolvement of mindsets and
attitudes. The Zimbabwe writer has a
tremendous task here to explore even the land reform in the mind.
In that regard “Tendai’s letter” by
Beaven Tapureta, though cryptic, manages somehow to problematise the land issue
in a more interesting manner than maybe Muchuri’s “letters.” Tendai is a Zimbabwean young woman in exile
in England but she has never lost sight of the events back home. Out in cold England, she works for a white
woman who not only calls her sister but also exploits her. For Tendai, sister achy and feminism are
abstract and lofty and does not address concrete issues.
Lawrence
Hoba’s “The Trek” is evidence that some budding writers are reading widely and
that one should not consider influences pernicious. Hoba’s story reads like Honwana’s short story
called “Papa-Snake and I.” Here as in
all prominent Southern African short
stories the child narrator sees much more than it intends to. In “The Trek” the narrator is very critical
of his father, an ex-fighter who has
acquired a farm formerly owned by a white man.
Father is lazy, always after beer parties. It is only mamma, throughout
the years, who has been the real land
tiller. The farm gate is written “Mr.
J.J. Magudu.” Why not “Mrs J.J. Magudu?”
asks the narrator.
The late Martin Denenga’s novella – “Weeping,”
is perhaps the greatest revelation of this literary journal. As you read the first paragraph of this fast
paced story, it occurs to you that this is a story that you will not ignore:
“Some people simply called him Goddard. His friends called him Tim and his wife
called him darling. His workers called him Goddard. His nickname was Minatonga,
which means I rule. He hated his nickname…”
“Weeping” is about a conflict between
a black community and a white farmer.
The white man accuses and punishes the community for poaching on his farm. The neighbouring black community, especially
Maruza, does not understand why and how they can be accused of poaching from
their own motherland and so the conflict rages on.
Denenga does not limit the land
conflict in Zimbabwe to one historical epoch, the land redistribution
period. He takes us back in time to
long-standing conflicts that existed between Baas Goddard and his African
neighbours of the adjacent Tribal Trust Land.
This helps to prove a historical fact that the animosity between blacks and
whites in Zimbabwe over land is as old as colonialism itself. The writer presents complex characters, black
and white, and helps dispel the myth of a superior race.
Denenga feels
deeply into the lives of farm folks and they ring true. Their fears are expressed in their Nyanja
laced conversations, drawing deep into their migrant labour backgrounds. Their constant refusal to succumb to fate is
best expressed in the seemingly mundane dance parties they organize in the farm
compounds. Amongst them are guitarists of note, gifted story tellers, bottom
wiggling dancers and legendary kick-boxers.
Since Chanjerai Hove’s novel called Bones,
a prizewinning 1989 publication, “Weeping” is, arguably, the only literary
piece in English that listens to the pulse of the farm-worker community. One hopes that local publishers will soon
take up this story. It is only sad that
Martin Denenga himself has passed on without seeing his work in print. Infact information at the BWAZ offices has it
that the unassuming Denenga was from a Marondera farming community. One day he dropped the script at BWAZ,
saying, “Read. Tell me what you think about it.” They were never to see him again. For over a year BWAZ put up notices in the
papers and Radio Zimbabwe for Denenga because internal assessors found the
script worth publishing. That tells the painful story of the struggles of
Zimbabwe’s new writers. Denenga died not knowing the fate of his story
and he remains unkwown.
Shimmer Chinodya makes a guest appearance in this
journal with his short story “Settlers.”
Chinodya like Stanley Nyamufukudza, Aaron Chiunduramoyo and Dr Charles
Mungoshi are some of the prominent writers who have worked very closely with
BWAZ in its various creative writing workshops across the country. Chinodya is
well known as a great innovator of the short story form and he does exactly
that with “Settlers.” Here the narrative follows the rambling thoughts of a new
farmer and as you read on, your spirit rises, sinks, rises…
This neatly bound and boldly printed journal is well annotated and user friendly. However the cover needed some deeper imagination. The picture of the eastern portions of Zimbabwe in loam soils could have been more appropriate for a Geography or Agriculture text book. One could have gone for a picture of many of Zimbabwe’s rolling wheat-lands or the never-ending stretches of newly ploughed red earths of early summer. The title too, is rather longish and its scholarly wording suggests, unnecessarily, regret. A shorter, sharper and poetic line could have just done a better job.
One hopes that
these writings will travel far and wide and contribute to both the debate and
action on the land issue in our country and elsewhere. Maybe, against all odds,
Zimbabwe’s more established writers could be pushed into writing about and
around the LAND ISSUE.