kwaChirere brings you this
exclusive and wide-ranging interview with veteran journalist *MOSES MAGADZA and BEAVEN TAPURETA, a well-known Zimbabwean
poet and arts organiser. Tapureta is the founding Director of Win Zimbabwe, an
organisation that networks Zimbabwean writers through the internet and through
workshops and readings. He was one of the key staffers at Budding Writers
Association of Zimbabwe (BWAZ) when it folded a decade ago. Tapureta is a trained
journalist.
Moses Magadza: You were one of the longest
serving officers at Budding Writers of Zimbabwe (BWAZ). What would you put down
as its major achievements?
Beaven Tapureta: BWAZ was like an academy where some writers
of my generation were initiated into the real world of writing. It is no secret
that some of my friends who are now recognised as poets or fiction writers
passed through BWAZ and I think that’s one of its achievements. It confirmed our passions as new writers.
There is Lawrence Hoba, now a published writer, Tinashe Muchuri, an established
poet and journalist, Mbizo Chirasha, a renowned performance poet, Tinashe
Mushakavanhu, now an editor, critic, and academic, others and myself who are
products of BWAZ one way or another. There is this generation of us now doing
different things but in the same literary arena.
Moses Magadza: Why did it fold when it did?
Beaven Tapurata:
From my own experience, BWAZ faced funding problems just like any donor-funded
organization. While some organisations like Zimbabwe Women Writers had at least
produced anthologies from which they were earning royalties, BWAZ had none to
sustain itself. BWAZ did not publish royalty-earning anthologies or books apart
from the print magazine and the first journal on the burning land issue.
Moses Magadza: You formed Win Zimbabwe to network all Zimbabwean writers at home and abroad. How feasible are your goals?
Beaven Tapurata:
I am realizing that the international aspect of WIN Zimbabwe is opening up new
forms of networking for published and unpublished writers in Zimbabwe and the diaspora.
We have played the middle person in linking local unpublished writers with
published Zimbabwean writers abroad or vice versa through our various platforms
such as the blog. A conversation has been created at least and we hope that in
the end, it’s the unpublished writer who must learn and benefit from the
networking.
Emmanuel
Sigauke is in USA but he is daily discussing literary issues with unpublished
writers via our newly created WIN-Zim Whatsapp Group. Unpublished writers in South Africa or
elsewhere abroad have connected themselves with what’s happening for them at
home in the literary field through WIN Zimbabwe’s online platforms.
Not
only have we connected with Zimbabwean writers at home and abroad but also with
different literary organisations abroad.
Moses Magadza: Why did you form Win-Zim instead of
going into formal employment? What is in
it for you?
Beaven Tapurata:
I worked at the National Arts Council of Zimbabwe when WIN was already in
existent. I had a short stint at the Zimbojam before I got ‘swayed’ by some
mighty hand to pursue full time the seed of my heart. I am content, I am happy
with my job. It is a formal job despite it taking long to pay off.
But
this is also where the problem is, that writers are not taken as workers in our
country or Africa. Until Zimbabwe, or
rather Africa begins to take its artists as workers, then shall we approach arts
as a profession.
No
wonder the disinterested position being taken by people and law agents in
stopping daylight book piracy demonstrates the general lack of knowledge that
writers are workers and that therefore they deserve what they earnestly earn.
I
am sure this is where Dambudzo Marechera quarrelled with people; nobody took
him as someone who had a serious job, a job he so much loved. I am in formal
employment as it is, but society looks at it from a different point of view. The
accepted thought is that no one survives on writing alone in Zimbabwe. We could
start another debate on whether one can be a full-time writer or not in
Zimbabwe. But we have Shimmer Chinodya, for example, who is a successful
full-time writer.
Beaven Tapureta: That’s totally not true. It would be unfair
to someone who has started his own new project from scratch and passion. Nhengu led BWAZ to where she led it and I will
lead WIN to where it is destined. May I
candidly say some of WIN Zimbabwe members were once with BWAZ. They were lost
and confused when BWAZ folded and I could not turn them away because their gifts
belong to neither WIN nor BWAZ but to God. This membership composition does not
however make WIN a shadow of BWAZ. I have always not wanted to engage in
competition with the BWAZ aftermath or any other writers’ organization because
I inherited nothing but skills and experience from my previous employment. Do you know that the now dead Zimbabwe
Writers Union (ZIWU) somehow gave rise to the formation of BWAZ and ZWW but
these organisations had different missions?
Or
a simpler example, would we say ZWA is another ZIWU minus its former leadership?
I don’t think so. ZIWU vanished due its own failures and ZWA has its own
different mission although it seemingly operates on the same level that ZIWU
did and has members who were once with the now defunct ZIWU.
Moses Magadza: What does the future hold for Win
Zim? I see that Win zim blog was nominated for a NAMA twice?
Beaven Tapureta:
The future is promising and we are determined to move on although we know
challenges are always there along the way. We are optimistic we will push
through.
Actually
the blog was nominated this year at the 12th NAMA Awards. The blog,
among other programmes or activities, has grown to be an inspiration to our members and on a larger scale, to all
writers who can access it. We have utilized it to promote local literature and
there have been good results.
We
use the internet to promote development of our literature.
Moses Magadza: What are your views on the idea that
young prize-winning authors of Zim simply chronicle the misdemeanours of Africa
in a sell-out way?
Beaven Tapureta:
‘Chronicle’ and ‘sell-out’, to me, are frightening words when speaking about
writers. Real writers do not chronicle but create. In a sense, they simply
creatively raise the ‘banner’ of the misdemeanours high so that everyone can
see and judge for themselves.
The
‘banner’ is seen from different angles by readers and it is normal that a book
receives all sorts of commentaries and criticisms.
A
book on serious issues affecting Africa published outside the author’s country,
widely reviewed outside, and probably awarded outside Africa, runs the risk of
being labelled sell-out literature. Yet Africans should be critical readers of
their own literature but if these internationally appreciated books by African writers
are not available to the majority of the people to whom they must appeal then
we also run the risk of judging the book by its internet cover.
Moses Magadza: What are your views on the new
Ministry of Sport, Arts and Culture in Zimbabwe?
Beaven Tapureta:
It’s a positive move. It was long overdue. I hope the new Ministry engages the
book sector and other related sectors so that the arts and culture are not
reduced to ‘the music industry’. I am saying music alone does not make the arts
and culture. The Ministry should promote balance.
Government, through the Ministry, should
increase support to the National Arts Council of Zimbabwe which should then complement
the Culture Fund of Zimbabwe in supporting the arts and culture sector.
National Arts Council should be granted capacity to fund arts and culture
sector like they once did with the Artists Development Fund.
Moses Magadza: What are your views on the idea that
ZIBF is stagnant and needs a young leadership?
Beaven Tapureta:
While I agree with the freedom of opinion of those who think young leadership
at ZIBF is the way forward, I disagree with them if they think bringing young
people in ZIBF solves all. The issue is about funding. Age is not the matter here. Does it mean that
if WIN starts under-performing due to lack of funds it means then that WIN
should look for an old person to replace me? The idea of proposing a young
leadership for ZIBF is simply a matter of hair-splitting. The real issue is
about funding. ZIBF has had various
directors and each drove ZIBF according resources available.
Moses Magadza: How would you reframe ZIBF?
Beaven Tapureta:
In terms of structure, I would say, as
an international book fair, it must have international branch offices, so that
Zimbabwean writers and publishers are assured of representation abroad. I know
this could be a far-fetched dream but it is achievable.
On
the other hand, such a big organisation ought to have departmental offices at
its Headquarters. Thus should funds permit, for instance, I would agree with
some who have suggested that ZIBF needs a PR, Accounts, Information Technology,
Marketing Departments and so forth…but these divisions of labour have to be few
to avoid a cumbersome staff.
Beaven Tapureta:
I don’t know for sure. Writers, like other artists, are citizens and I think it
is a personal phenomenon whether one is related or totally not related to any political
party in Zimbabwe.
Moses Magadza: What is your evaluation of current writers’
organisation in Zimbabwe at the moment?
Beaven Tapureta:
The existent writers’ organisations are working so hard but there’s not enough
funding going towards them. If our reading culture is to improve there’s need
to support existent organisations which
are closely connected with communities.
Zimbabwe
Women Writers has done so well in promoting women voices, Zimbabwe Writers
Association (ZWA) is also playing its part. We in Win-Zimbabwe are playing
ours. The non-academic writers (ZANA) are moving on. There are other writers’ organisations
looming up and hopefully we all contribute to the growth of our literature.
Beaven Tapureta: Zimbabwean literature has always deified the land;
you can read (Chenjerai) Hove, (Charles) Mungoshi and others whose novels are sometimes
set in the rural area where the relationship between man and his land is more
defined. But regarding the land reform that was done by the government I must
say our literature took a nosedive on the land issue as the issue became a political
conflict between Zimbabwe and Britain. The artist’s failure to objectively write
about the fast-track land reform issue at
the time when it happened may have largely been caused by the burning politics
surrounding it and therefore writers were possibly faced with the age-old
question about the role of the artist in politics.
However,
there is published literature about the land reform from different
perspectives. For instance, The Trek and Other Stories by Lawrence
Hoba and before that, BWAZ published an epistolary journal called Exploding Myths about Zimbabwe’s Land Issue:
The Budding Writers’ Perspectives in 2004.
It
could be true that writers wouldn’t want to record history in a journalistic or
propagandist way; they are probably still thinking how creatively they can write
about it.
*Winner of the SADC Media Award (2008) and
nine other awards, Moses Magadza is a Zimbabwean journalist and editor. He is
broadening his mind in the School of Postgraduate Studies at the University of
Namibia.
No comments:
Post a Comment