an analysis By
Jairos
Gonye
Chibhasikoro
and borrowdale dance routines
have been the most fascinating dance features in Zimbabwe since Independence in 1980. Chibhasikoro
is a dance apparently popular with farm and growth point settings and involves
peculiar moves resembling a bicycle rider’s pedalling strokes. Borrowdale is originally a ghetto dance
whose popular moves seem to imitate those of a horse rider and the horse as
seen competing at the well known and affluent Borrowdale Race-course in Harare.
The chibhasikoro
and borrowdale moves, respectively, are
interpreted as reminiscent of the ‘cargo
cult’ whereby African dancers, in their
want, theatrically denote their wish to
ride bicycles and horses while connoting underlying desires to have improved
social and economic status. Both dances seem to be enacted all over Zimbabwe and
unlike the traditional socio-cultural-specific dances (mbakumba, jerusarema or
muchongoyo), Chibhasikoro and borrowdale are more national rather than ethnic. Both dances
are viewed as social, psychological and entertainment tools of communication.
Background:
In colonial Rhodesia
farm settlements where the largely dispossessed Africans sojourned, the farm
shop and beer hall turned into cultural exchange and entertainment centres
after a long day of farming. In particular, community-produced dancers and
musicians would perform for social entertainment on the farms during weeknights
and for commercial purposes in towns during weekends. Among the popular names
were; Somanje, Chimbetu and Tazvida, from
Marondera, Chegutu and Masvingo farms, respectively. Their 1980’s musical compositions were a mixture of; jiti, sungura and chachacha and they experienced a simultaneous rise with the chibhasikoro dance.
Considerable energy is expended with dancers using all
their body zones. Dancers exhibit exceptional footwork, dexterously stepping
their feet forwards and backwards at a rapid alternate pace like cyclists, while
they simultaneously mimick the action of
throwing morsels (of sadza?)in their mouths.
The dancers have
their upper waists loosely and obliquely pivoted to allow free shaking of the
hips and buttocks. Intricate moves; performed with legs bent in a crouching
fashion, reveal the dancers’ athletic agility. Their upper bodies produce several
gestures and moves that are in sync with the movements of the lower half. Hands
stretch out to imaginary bicycle handle bars. Bars; which freely dissolve into
automobile gears.
The dance
reaches a full gallop as the dancer pull out to the front and draw his second
and last fingers out like ears of race horses, while the imaginary competitors
chase on. The rider moves on coordinated feet, a hand intermittently urging the
‘horse’ on, facial gestures and head movements corroborating the energy sapping
nature of the dance.
With its origins
in capitalist commerce, borrowdale dance
was essentially performed to entertain the betting spectators at the
racecourse. Yet, we see the poor urbanites harness the dance to communicate
their pent up social grievances and wants, disguised in the wish to win the anual OK
Grand Challenge prize.
A male dancer
observed that, “Borrowdale is a poor
ghetto man’s dance with a rich man’s name. It’s not by coincidence that dancers
imitate horses competing at Borrowdale Racecourse. They also dream of one day
owning a house in Borrowdale. It shows how people cling on to false hope in
order to cope with poverty and want.”
The idea of
imitation mentioned here is an expression of what is expected. If the early
hunters’ hunting catch dance prefigured the desired catch, by analogy, punters
bet because they expect to win and dancers dance borrowdale because they also want the good life associated with Borrowdale suburb.
This is reminiscent of the spirit shown in cargo cultism, particularly inspired
by the difficult lifestyles the have-nots lead, while constantly being
bombarded with possibility images.
Once I achieved a keener appreciation of borrowdale from watching Alick Macheso
go through it. Macheso looked such an innovative hybrid master mixer. In partnership
with the flexible Franko Dhaka (Slomo), the duo performed some delightful
kangaroo-like spring dances, twisting their thighs like razor wire. Then, having
exhausted all the other competitors out of the borrowdale gallop, the pair apparently wrestled technique from
technology. And, inscribing photo-finish technology unto themselves, they
performed the dance in slow motion - conscious that they were creating an
unprecedented choreography in Zimbabwe dance. On reflection, I saw that this
was an instance of innovative improvisation of skills that guarantee beauty and
perfection in whatever art form.
As if to say,
our dance is as fast as the racing horse, therefore to appreciate it, you need
to ‘slow motion’ the dance, Macheso and Slomo effectively obliterated the
boundary between performed dance and technology. They sent cameramen rushing to
shoot the ‘illusion’ of the ‘horses’ in slow motion. Though borrowdale dance is synonymous with
Macheso, in Zimbabwe, it is generally agreed nobody owns a dance just as nobody
owns the daily multiplying language.
Conclusion: The two dances have become as
culturally meaningful as mbakumba,
jerusarema or muchongoyo. The
difference is that the two contemporary dances have no ethnic borders
inscribing them unlike the three indigenous dances named above.
On the surface, chibhasikoro or borrowdale may denote joy, contentment and play acting, but
underneath, they connote complex messages such as comments on farm labourers’
grievances with their lifestyles, urban struggles and the desire to lead less
stultifying, but fulfilling lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment